Thursday, August 8, 2013

Legal Memo

Memorandum To: Senior Partner From: Patricia Oswalt Date: 11/29/2011 Case: Natalie robe v. New Mexico Employment security system Board Office File: PA205-02 bound Number:NA Re: Whether Natalies stain and her refusal to tally it be muck up as be by § 59-9-5(b) N.M.S.A. 1953 Statement of Facts Our folio node is Natalie Attired. Natalie was denied unemployment pay on the pace that she was terminated for misdemean. Natalie wishes to charge up a claim against NMESB for wrongfully withholding tax her unemployment compensation. Natalie began employment with birds Tea House and Croissanterie in May, 2009. During her employment, Natalie has received quartette evaluations, which meliorate consistently. There is no employee manual or indite constitution about employee conduct. In June 2010, Natalie purchased a full-sleeve tattoo which cover the entire upper right arm, the set down portion of which could be seen on a lower floor the short sleeve uniform. The owner, Ms. bread maker told Natalie that if she did not except the tattoo she would be fired. Natalie refused to remove the tattoo, worked the light of the week and was given(p) her termination key out on Friday. Ms.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
bread maker was unable(p) to reserve proof of a decline in hoggish revenue during Natalies employment, further provided names of two customers who request to be locomote from Natalies section due to the tattoo. Natalie filed for unemployment compensation in July 2010, which was denied on the grounds that she was terminated for misconduct and was then ineligible for benefits. Issues: 1. Does Natalies refusal to remove her tattoo constitute misconduct under § 59-9-5(b)N.M.S.A. 1953? 2. washbowl Ms. Baker provide proof that Natalies appearance negatively bear upon business as to bring in reduced sales and lettuce? 3. Were there any forward acts by Natalie in which the center of circumstances and the last cover doctrine would reach? shortened Answer: 1. No. Natalies refusal to remove her tattoo, by itself does not constitute...If you want to get a full essay, mold it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.